Series links:

• Part 1 - Introduction
• Part 2 - Copyright and the Public Domain
• Part 3 - Copyright and Technology (This page!)
• Part 4 - Positioning Copyright
• Part 5 - Policing Patents
• Part 6 - Closing Comments

Technology - Copyright's Bane and Boon for over a Century

Copyright has had a dependably repeating relationship with technology for over a century now.

The relationship goes like this:

1. A new innovation comes along, which either makes copyrighted material more easily available or makes it easier to create copyrightable material without expertise
2. The incumbents, threatened by this, complain like heck
3. The market (and maybe the incumbents) adapt, and much money is made
4. Something new is invented, everyone forgets history and goes back to step 1

It happened with the automatic piano player - "Musicians will go bankrupt! Who will learn musical instruments when the machine can play for them?".
It happened with the radio - "Who will pay for records if they can hear them for free?".
It happened (quite famously) with the video cassette recorder - "Who will pay for films when they can record them from the TV?"

And yet - as in each of the cases I mention there - after incumbents predict the death of their industry, they then they embrace the technology and make MUCH money from it.

Note that examples which allowed more creativity - cheaper cinefilm or video cameras, cheaper home recording, cheaper distribution - don't generate such protests. I'll let you figure out why that is yourself - but if you must have a clue, then it is the words "monopoly" and "distribution".

Series links:

• Part 1 - Introduction
• Part 2 - Copyright and the Public Domain (This page!)
• Part 3 - Copyright and Technology
• Part 4 - Positioning Copyright
• Part 5 - Policing Patents
• Part 6 - Closing Comments

What is the public domain?

The Public Domain is where works that aren't subject to intellectual property laws go.

Sometimes, a work is in the public domain because it's not eligible for protection under intellectual property laws. Sometimes, it's there because the period for which is was eligible for protection has expired. And sometimes, it's there because its creator donated it.

Not all regions in the world share the same views or have the same rights for the public domain.

Why is the public domain important?

Are you kidding me?

For a couple of years now, I've been more and more disappointed with the way the world's IP laws have been trending. I believe that they are moving away from their original intentions in subtle (and not-so-subtle) ways, and that this is increasingly rendering them unfit for purpose.

So I thought I'd write a series of short articles in which I take a positive stance, and say how we can improve them.

Structure

Here's the rough outline of what to expect - links will be provided as each one is written:

• Part 1 - Introduction (This page!)
• Part 2 - Copyright and the Public Domain
• Part 3 - Copyright and Technology
• Part 4 - Positioning Copyright
• Part 5 - Policing Patents
• Part 6 - Closing Comments

But before we can dive into the wonders of Copyright and the Public Domain, I would be doing every reader a disservice if I didn't explain my own use of intellectual copyright laws, and then give a very brief overview of intellectual property law's purpose as I see it.

On Wednesday the 18th, Wikipedia is going dark globally to protest against the latest ham-fisted intellectual property laws.

I've put a banner up for the duration, so every page on this website will have an anti-SOPA statement. I don't see a need for a full blackout - and I don't want to turn away those that may need vCardSplit, which accounts for most of my visits.

But I do see a need to protest.

Increasingly, we are heading towards a world with very heavy-handed laws about intellectual property. And that's fine, in principle. I have no problems with it.

Seriously.

I'm the kind of guy who buys his music, films, software and books. I've never liked ripping people off, and if I can get it legally for a reasonable price, I will.

There really should be a rant here about how many companies then won't sell you something and complain that people went and got it illegally anyway. Which is usually the driver for most copyright infringement. But that really is a rant for another day...

If I'm for decent laws about intellectual property, why am I against legislation such as SOPA, PIPA and the UK's Digital Economy Act 2010?

Because they don't get the balance right.

Generally, all IP law being proposed these days has three major faults:

• It lacks an assumption of innocence
• It lacks due process
• It lacks suitable penalties for misuse

I dislike committing to schedules when it comes to creative things.

For starters, sometimes creativity isn't something you can schedule.

But more importantly, I have to choose what to create. Photos, writing or coding?

And then there's balancing this with having a social life, and the general administrivia of being alive.

So committing to a schedule for creative works is difficult, and no matter how much I'd like to commit to something like the 365 Project it just isn't going to happen.

However, maybe I can set an average for to achieve over the next year. Some kind of target without hard deadlines, but that allows for occasional lulls or bouts of high productivity... That's much more like it!